posted on 19/11/2020 12:27How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci.
* You know, the one which you've been crowing about (but clearly haven't read a word of).
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27673 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22114 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23012 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23337 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23012 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23936 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24132 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23995 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24570 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24237 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24424 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25198 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24646 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25355 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24782 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25308 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25099 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25312 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24921 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24828 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25074 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24667 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24921 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25312 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25099 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25308 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24782 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25355 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24646 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25198 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24424 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24237 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24570 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25020 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24162 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23742 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23087 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22676 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23087 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23742 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24162 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23995 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22114 times)

