posted on 19/11/2020 12:27How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci.
* You know, the one which you've been crowing about (but clearly haven't read a word of).
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25859 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20617 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21475 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21768 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21475 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22274 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22504 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22396 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22970 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22670 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22828 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23557 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23086 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23753 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23193 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23735 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23461 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23691 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23317 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23134 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23488 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23132 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23317 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23691 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23461 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23735 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23193 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23753 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23086 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23557 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22828 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22670 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22970 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23377 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22590 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22180 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21513 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21138 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21513 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22180 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22590 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22396 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20617 times)

