posted on 19/11/2020 12:27How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci.
* You know, the one which you've been crowing about (but clearly haven't read a word of).
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21180 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17097 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17877 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18246 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17877 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18710 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18899 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18825 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19043 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19147 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19179 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19571 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19567 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19823 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19611 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19718 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19873 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19765 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19766 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19560 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19504 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19580 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19766 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19765 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19873 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19718 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19611 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19823 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19567 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19571 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19179 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19147 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19043 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19397 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18989 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18221 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17963 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17275 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17963 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18221 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18989 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18825 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17097 times)