posted on 19/11/2020 12:27How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci.
* You know, the one which you've been crowing about (but clearly haven't read a word of).
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
The information is, I think, published on page 26 of it, or thereabouts, from memory. I have read it and assessed it as a whole.
That was an important aspect in the context of what is happening and reported in the news.
More immediately, I used it in an answer to EmCee in this thread because it was relevant.
Your contribution was then "which hard left, apologist publication did you lift that from?"
You are comedy GOLD.
ROR again.
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26132 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20813 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21665 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21971 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21665 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22540 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22773 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22585 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23184 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22851 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23008 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23756 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23270 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23942 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23373 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23926 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23664 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23887 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23516 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23365 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23696 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23327 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23516 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23887 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23664 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23926 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23373 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23942 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23270 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23756 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23008 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22851 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23184 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23620 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22793 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22386 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21736 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21370 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21736 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22386 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22793 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22585 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20813 times)

