posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae
well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12998 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11041 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11410 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11834 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11410 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12126 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12347 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12464 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12433 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12638 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12693 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12845 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12994 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13079 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13127 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13111 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13174 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13025 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13177 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12979 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12903 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12856 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13177 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13025 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13174 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13111 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13127 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13079 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12994 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12845 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12693 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12638 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12433 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12739 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12497 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12012 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11778 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11216 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11778 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12012 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12497 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12464 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11041 times)