posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27775 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22212 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23116 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23470 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23116 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24069 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24255 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24113 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24682 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24349 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24540 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25311 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24779 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25472 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24900 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25423 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25220 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25420 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25033 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24973 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25184 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24786 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25033 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25420 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25220 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25423 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24900 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25472 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24779 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25311 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24540 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24349 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24682 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25133 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24268 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23849 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23206 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22790 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23206 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23849 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24268 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24113 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22212 times)


