posted on 19/11/2020 11:36Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci.
This:
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20825 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16798 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17561 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17915 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17561 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18389 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18564 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18482 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18708 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18789 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18818 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19228 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19198 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19443 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19247 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19366 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19507 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19374 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19407 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19216 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19154 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19198 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19407 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 19374 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19507 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 19366 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19247 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19443 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19198 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19228 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18818 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18789 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18708 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19043 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18663 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17895 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17641 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16961 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17641 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17895 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18663 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18482 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16798 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.