posted on 19/11/2020 11:36Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci.
This:
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22983 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18447 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19253 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19576 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19253 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20132 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20332 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20201 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20557 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20528 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20604 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21123 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20942 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21385 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21033 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21321 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21298 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21324 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21183 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20933 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21122 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21011 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21183 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21324 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21298 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21321 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21033 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21385 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20942 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21123 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20604 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20528 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20557 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20961 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20392 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19761 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19323 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18744 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19323 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19761 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20392 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20201 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18447 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.