posted on 19/11/2020 11:36Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci.
This:
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) protect freedom of expression and freedom of association. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the ECHR directly into UK law....
... Article 10 will protect Labour Party members who, for example, make legitimate criticisms of the Israeli government, or express their opinions on internal Party matters, such as the scale of antisemitism within the Party, based on their own experience and within the law.
(And BTW Chris Williamson is not a member of the Labour Party. And BTW is there summat wrong with supporting the Palestinan cause for human rights?)
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 20483 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16447 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17232 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 17554 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 17232 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 18027 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 18200 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18134 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18339 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18421 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18441 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18838 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18813 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19050 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18854 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18964 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19108 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18979 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19025 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 18823 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 18744 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 18821 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 19025 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 18979 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 19108 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 18964 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 18854 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 19050 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 18813 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 18838 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 18441 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 18421 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 18339 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 18686 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18262 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17565 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17320 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 16644 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 17320 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 17565 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 18262 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 18134 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 16447 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.