2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)

You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.

- A Farewell to Kings -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21626 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17473 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18251 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18566 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19080 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19293 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19160 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19359 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19485 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19519 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19891 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19869 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20139 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 19927 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20048 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20189 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20084 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20082 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19883 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19876 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 19946 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19733 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19358 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18567 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18296 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17599 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

Report Abuse

Post Your Reply