posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae
well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23018 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18472 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19280 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19608 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19280 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20158 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20358 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20230 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20596 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20562 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20635 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21163 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20983 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21423 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21068 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21359 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21329 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21360 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21214 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20962 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21148 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21045 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21214 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21360 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21329 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21359 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21068 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21423 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20983 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21163 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20635 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20562 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20596 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20997 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20423 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19799 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19350 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 18779 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19350 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 19799 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20423 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20230 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18472 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.