posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25858 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20617 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21473 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21766 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21473 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22274 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22504 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22396 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22968 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22670 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22827 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23557 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23084 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23752 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23191 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23735 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23461 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23691 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23316 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23132 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23485 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23131 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23316 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23691 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23461 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23735 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23191 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23752 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23084 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23557 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22827 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22670 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22968 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23375 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22590 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22178 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21511 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21138 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21511 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22178 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22590 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22396 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20617 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


