posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28406 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22631 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23537 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23904 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23537 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24485 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24676 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24533 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25128 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24798 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25002 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25794 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25217 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25948 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25365 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25892 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25706 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25879 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25467 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25435 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25643 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25208 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25467 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25879 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25706 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25892 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25365 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25948 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25217 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25794 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25002 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24798 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25128 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25571 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24686 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24280 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23631 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23216 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23631 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24280 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24686 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24533 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22631 times)


