posted on 19/11/2020 13:27Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae

well done Sir take a bow, a 10 post 4 hour gotchya that FINALLY got where you wanted it (after pushing and poking) and despite me stating I agreed with the statement anyway (even after you tried to imply otherwise) and you then lying about the source and not linking it (something you usually seem so keen to do)
You keep that one tucked away for your AS apologists and the fight ahead comrade.
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25610 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20396 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21231 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21557 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21231 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22061 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22268 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22155 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22733 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22423 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22580 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23312 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22872 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23530 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22957 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23485 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23224 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23474 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23115 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22932 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23302 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22952 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23115 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23474 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23224 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23485 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22957 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23530 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22872 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23312 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22580 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22423 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22733 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23170 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22368 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21969 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21289 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20915 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21289 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21969 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22368 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22155 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20396 times)


