posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28086 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22425 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23341 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23695 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23341 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24294 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24498 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24341 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24940 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24610 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24809 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25592 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25019 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25726 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25149 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25695 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25481 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25664 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25261 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25217 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25445 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25020 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25261 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25664 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25481 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25695 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25149 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25726 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25019 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25592 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24809 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24610 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24940 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25380 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24508 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24096 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23452 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23022 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23452 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24096 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24508 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24341 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22425 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

