posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13005 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11057 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11423 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11845 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11423 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12135 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12352 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12483 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12453 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12656 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12707 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12858 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13004 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13092 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13136 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13128 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13189 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13040 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13185 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12987 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12913 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12867 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13185 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13040 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13189 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13128 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13136 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13092 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13004 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12858 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12707 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12656 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12453 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12750 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12510 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12023 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11784 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11227 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11784 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12023 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12510 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12483 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11057 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.