posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24968 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20041 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20841 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21171 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20841 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21665 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21897 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21768 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22340 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22049 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22166 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22906 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22474 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23132 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22562 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23098 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22826 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23084 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22720 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22498 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22918 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22572 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22720 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23084 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22826 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23098 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22562 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23132 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22474 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22906 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22166 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22049 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22340 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22756 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21967 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21552 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20897 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20511 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20897 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21552 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21967 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21768 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20041 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

