posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23823 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19239 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20052 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20354 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20052 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20876 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21094 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20983 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21363 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21287 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21370 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21933 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21696 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22176 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21787 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22142 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22050 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22108 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21949 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21681 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21907 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21748 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21949 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22108 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22050 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22142 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21787 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22176 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21696 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21933 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21370 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21287 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21363 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21745 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21164 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20579 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20075 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19523 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20075 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20579 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21164 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20983 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19239 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

