posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28897 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22990 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23894 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24268 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23894 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24851 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25046 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24900 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25498 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25160 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25362 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26142 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25599 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26301 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25744 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26248 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26075 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26229 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25828 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25824 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25996 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25558 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25828 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26229 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26075 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26248 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25744 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26301 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25599 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26142 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25362 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25160 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25498 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25930 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25045 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24639 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23994 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23577 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23994 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24639 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25045 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24900 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22990 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

