posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26460 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21157 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22014 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22359 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22014 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22929 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23148 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22960 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23582 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23223 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23396 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24148 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23677 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24353 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23772 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24316 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24052 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24309 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23897 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23789 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24101 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23726 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23897 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24309 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24052 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24316 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23772 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24353 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23677 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24148 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23396 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23223 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23582 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24020 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23170 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22776 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22116 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21732 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22116 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22776 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23170 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22960 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21157 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

