home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 12804

Messaging Enabled

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin

And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25855 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20614 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21470 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21764 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22272 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22504 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22396 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22967 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22667 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22824 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23555 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23080 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23749 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23182 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23709 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23458 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23688 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23312 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23131 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23482 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23124 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23372 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22587 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22174 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21506 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21133 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.