posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28460 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22660 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23568 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23922 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23568 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24516 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24711 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24561 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25146 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24825 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25033 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25820 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25242 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25972 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25395 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25921 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25738 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25898 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25494 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25467 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25665 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25235 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25494 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25898 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25738 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25921 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25395 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25972 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25242 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25820 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25033 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24825 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25146 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25603 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24720 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24312 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23670 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23254 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23670 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24312 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24720 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24561 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22660 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

