posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25152 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20156 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20970 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21296 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20970 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21800 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22025 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21892 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22456 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22182 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22311 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23031 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22595 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23257 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22673 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23216 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22950 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23202 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22848 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22643 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23038 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22701 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22848 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23202 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22950 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23216 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22673 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23257 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22595 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23031 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22311 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22182 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22456 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22879 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22105 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21675 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21020 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20641 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21020 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21675 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22105 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21892 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20156 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

