posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 30735 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24525 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25441 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 25864 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25441 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 26410 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 26646 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26549 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27174 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26818 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26984 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27788 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27220 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27886 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 27349 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27821 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27723 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27816 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27436 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 27542 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 27592 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 27117 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27436 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27816 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27723 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27821 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 27349 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27886 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 27220 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27788 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26984 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26818 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 27174 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 27537 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26659 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26201 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25553 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 25135 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25553 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 26201 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26659 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26549 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24525 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

