home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 12804

Messaging Enabled

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin

And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24071 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19418 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20233 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20554 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21073 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21295 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21170 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21582 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21470 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21566 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22166 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21891 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22408 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21973 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22368 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22225 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22336 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22117 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21873 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22152 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21961 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21986 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21369 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20808 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20284 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19761 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.