posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25038 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20119 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20924 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21239 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20924 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21737 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21949 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21844 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22400 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22128 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22246 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22974 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22532 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23199 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22622 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23160 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22898 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23153 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22799 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22580 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22981 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22620 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22799 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23153 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22898 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23160 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22622 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23199 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22532 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22974 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22246 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22128 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22400 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22816 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22025 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21609 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20954 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20577 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20954 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21609 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22025 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21844 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20119 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

