posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 30512 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24319 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25236 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 25635 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25236 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 26201 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 26430 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26302 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26940 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26580 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26745 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27579 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26973 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27660 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 27100 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27593 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27485 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27577 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27180 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 27253 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 27346 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26874 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27180 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27577 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27485 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27593 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 27100 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27660 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26973 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27579 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26745 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26580 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26940 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 27309 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26424 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25980 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25330 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24911 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25330 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25980 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26424 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26302 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24319 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

