posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25021 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20103 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20909 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21233 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20909 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21721 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21942 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21835 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22391 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22118 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22234 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22959 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22526 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23188 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22610 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23141 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22889 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23137 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22792 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22573 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22968 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22616 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22792 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23137 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22889 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23141 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22610 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23188 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22526 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22959 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22234 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22118 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22391 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22804 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22018 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21599 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20947 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20563 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20947 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21599 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22018 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21835 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20103 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

