posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27682 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22122 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23021 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23345 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23021 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23945 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24139 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24001 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24577 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24246 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24431 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25206 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24658 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25365 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24793 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25319 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25107 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25320 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24929 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24836 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25083 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24678 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24929 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25320 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25107 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25319 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24793 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25365 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24658 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25206 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24431 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24246 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24577 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25030 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24175 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23755 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23094 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22687 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23094 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23755 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24175 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24001 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22122 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

