home about dictionary mobile mode

Click to enlarge

Posts: 12804

Messaging Enabled

Back to the board Previous Post Next Post Reply

posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin

And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24952 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20032 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20834 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21165 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21657 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21891 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21759 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22330 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22044 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22157 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22897 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22466 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23129 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22556 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23090 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22818 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23079 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22712 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22494 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22908 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22561 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22747 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21959 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21547 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20892 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20504 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.