posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23710 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19122 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19943 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20244 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19943 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20787 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21002 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20875 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21271 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21194 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21282 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21825 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21609 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22082 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21696 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22031 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21952 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22026 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21834 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21582 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21826 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21660 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21834 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22026 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21952 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22031 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21696 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22082 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21609 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21825 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21282 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21194 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21271 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21658 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21072 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20481 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19994 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19433 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19994 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20481 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21072 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20875 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19122 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.