posted on 18/11/2020 16:19It has and it was - arty_fufkin
And as we have done for over 100 years, we are now fighting each other and allowing the Tories off the hook. It is utter madness.
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23221 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18671 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19491 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 19804 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 19491 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20346 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 20558 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20443 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20826 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20778 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20856 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21387 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21188 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21636 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21265 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21598 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21534 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21580 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21422 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21144 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21353 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21232 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21422 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 21580 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 21534 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 21598 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21265 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 21636 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21188 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21387 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 20856 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 20778 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 20826 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21206 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20628 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20012 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19534 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19001 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 19534 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20012 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 20628 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20443 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 18671 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.