posted on 18/11/2020 18:03Re: It has and it was - Nicolae
So you'd disagree with one Viber saying it's just "some made up anti semitism crap" and another claiming "You and I know full well it was ******" then?
doesn't seem that certain Labour supporters are taking in the reality of the report's findings
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12487 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10652 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11017 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11407 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11017 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 11698 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 11903 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12022 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12002 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12210 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12257 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12386 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12531 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12597 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12658 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12664 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12689 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12577 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12714 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12509 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12447 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12395 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 12714 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12577 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 12689 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 12664 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 12658 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12597 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12531 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12386 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12257 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12210 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12002 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12284 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12055 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11584 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11356 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 10823 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11356 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11584 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12055 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12022 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10652 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.