posted on 18/11/2020 18:03Re: It has and it was - Nicolae
So you'd disagree with one Viber saying it's just "some made up anti semitism crap" and another claiming "You and I know full well it was ******" then?
doesn't seem that certain Labour supporters are taking in the reality of the report's findings
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 13016 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11065 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11431 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11850 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11431 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12138 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12359 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12489 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12466 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12667 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12713 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12874 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13013 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13100 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13141 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13141 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13196 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13051 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13196 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 13000 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12929 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12876 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13196 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 13051 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13196 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13141 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13141 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 13100 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 13013 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12874 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12713 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12667 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12466 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12758 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12519 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12035 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11790 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11235 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11790 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 12035 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12519 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12489 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 11065 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.