posted on 18/11/2020 18:03Re: It has and it was - Nicolae
So you'd disagree with one Viber saying it's just "some made up anti semitism crap" and another claiming "You and I know full well it was ******" then?
doesn't seem that certain Labour supporters are taking in the reality of the report's findings
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21911 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17662 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18431 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18731 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18431 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19250 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19475 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19362 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19554 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19675 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19718 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20102 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20077 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20366 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20166 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20288 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20424 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20315 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20313 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20062 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20086 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20122 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20313 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20315 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20424 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20288 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20166 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20366 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20077 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20102 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19718 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19675 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19554 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19921 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19531 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18755 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18461 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17774 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18461 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18755 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19531 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19362 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17662 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.