posted on 18/11/2020 18:03Re: It has and it was - Nicolae
So you'd disagree with one Viber saying it's just "some made up anti semitism crap" and another claiming "You and I know full well it was ******" then?
doesn't seem that certain Labour supporters are taking in the reality of the report's findings
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21745 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17564 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18330 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18640 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18330 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19135 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19361 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19241 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19445 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19561 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19608 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19977 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19967 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20239 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20042 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20153 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20286 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20196 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20182 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19961 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19969 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20026 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20182 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20196 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20286 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20153 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20042 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20239 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19967 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19977 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19608 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19561 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19445 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19810 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19427 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18659 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18364 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17672 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18364 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18659 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19427 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19241 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17564 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.