posted on 18/11/2020 18:03Re: It has and it was - Nicolae
So you'd disagree with one Viber saying it's just "some made up anti semitism crap" and another claiming "You and I know full well it was ******" then?
doesn't seem that certain Labour supporters are taking in the reality of the report's findings
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21730 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17552 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18325 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18630 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18325 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19128 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19353 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19229 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19438 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19552 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19590 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19968 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19958 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20236 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20033 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20148 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20279 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20181 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20169 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19955 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19957 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20014 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20169 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20181 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20279 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20148 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20033 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20236 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19958 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19968 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19590 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19552 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19438 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19799 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19421 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18644 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18358 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17666 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18358 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18644 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19421 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19229 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17552 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.