posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24615 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19796 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20606 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20926 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20606 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21442 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21652 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21524 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22046 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21819 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21922 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22627 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22249 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22854 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22315 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22819 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22580 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22793 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22479 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22242 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22621 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22325 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22479 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22793 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22580 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22819 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22315 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22854 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22249 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22627 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21922 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21819 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22046 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22459 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21732 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21264 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20662 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20246 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20662 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21264 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21732 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21524 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19796 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


