posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25391 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20272 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21095 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21410 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21095 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21909 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22124 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22008 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22585 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22292 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22436 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23159 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22711 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23385 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22795 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23336 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23067 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23328 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22968 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22770 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23165 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22794 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22968 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23328 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23067 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23336 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22795 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23385 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22711 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23159 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22436 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22292 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22585 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22994 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22210 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21795 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21146 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20782 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21146 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21795 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22210 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22008 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20272 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


