posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 27322 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21822 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22705 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23034 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22705 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23625 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23824 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23664 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24260 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23928 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24107 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24858 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24329 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25026 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24468 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24987 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24774 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25002 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24601 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 24511 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24758 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 24366 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24601 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25002 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24774 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24987 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 24468 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25026 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 24329 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24858 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24107 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23928 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 24260 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24710 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23860 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23450 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22803 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 22387 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22803 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 23450 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23860 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23664 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21822 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


