posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26321 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21032 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21885 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22203 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21885 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22762 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22981 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22824 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23417 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23077 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23235 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23981 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23494 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24160 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23606 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24145 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23889 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24122 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23746 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23610 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23924 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23554 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23746 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24122 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23889 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24145 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23606 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24160 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23494 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23981 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23235 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23077 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23417 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23855 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23003 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22608 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21958 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21598 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21958 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22608 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23003 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22824 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21032 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


