posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 30320 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24167 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25086 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 25463 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 25086 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 26035 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 26229 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26153 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26729 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26385 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26555 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27374 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26803 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27499 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26944 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27412 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27294 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27411 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27021 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 27090 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 27172 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 26695 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 27021 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 27411 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 27294 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 27412 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 26944 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 27499 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 26803 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 27374 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 26555 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 26385 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 26729 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 27106 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26241 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25804 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25174 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 24760 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 25174 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 25804 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 26241 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 26153 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 24167 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


