posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26650 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21293 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22167 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22482 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22167 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 23066 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23300 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23108 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23732 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23373 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23555 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24338 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23833 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24515 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23930 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24483 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24219 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24484 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24071 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23921 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24257 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23871 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 24071 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24484 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24219 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24483 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23930 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24515 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23833 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24338 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23555 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23373 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23732 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24170 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23320 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22930 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22250 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21872 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22250 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22930 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23320 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 23108 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21293 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


