posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 23818 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19236 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20051 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 20353 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20051 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 20871 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21087 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20980 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21360 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21283 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21368 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21931 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21695 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22174 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21783 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22136 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22045 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22106 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21941 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 21679 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 21903 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 21745 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 21941 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 22106 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22045 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 22136 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 21783 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 22174 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 21695 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 21931 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 21368 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 21283 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 21360 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 21741 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21157 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20575 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20073 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 19520 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20073 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 20575 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21157 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 20980 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 19236 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


