posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25998 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20675 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21526 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21827 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21526 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22393 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22629 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22448 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23017 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22714 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22866 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23602 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23125 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23787 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23229 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23774 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23506 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23730 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23359 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23186 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23537 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23182 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23359 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23730 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23506 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23774 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23229 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23787 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23125 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23602 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22866 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22714 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23017 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23466 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22652 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22247 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21586 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21206 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21586 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22247 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22652 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22448 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20675 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


