posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 24945 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20025 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20828 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21159 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20828 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21655 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21882 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21751 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22324 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22039 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22153 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22890 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22462 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23124 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22554 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23084 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22813 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23073 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22708 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22488 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22906 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22555 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22708 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23073 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22813 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23084 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22554 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23124 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22462 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22890 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22153 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22039 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22324 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22742 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21955 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21539 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20885 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20498 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20885 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21539 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 21955 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21751 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20025 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


