posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- A Farewell to Kings -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21751 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17570 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18334 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18642 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18334 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19136 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19364 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19243 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19446 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19564 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19608 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19979 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19967 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20239 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20042 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20155 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20289 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20198 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20183 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 19963 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 19971 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20029 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20183 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20198 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20289 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20155 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20042 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20239 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 19967 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 19979 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19608 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19564 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19446 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19815 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19429 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18660 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18368 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17675 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18368 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18660 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19429 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19243 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17570 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.