posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26460 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21157 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22015 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22359 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 22015 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22929 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23152 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22962 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23583 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23224 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23397 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24149 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23679 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24355 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23774 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24317 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24054 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24310 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23899 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23790 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24102 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23727 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23899 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24310 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24054 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24317 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23774 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24355 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23679 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24149 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23397 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23224 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23583 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 24022 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23171 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22779 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22121 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21735 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22121 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22779 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23171 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22962 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21157 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


