posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Nicolae - a 's**t spammer' and a 'nobody muppet' -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 22035 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17727 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18511 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18816 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18511 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19350 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19573 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19428 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19625 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19756 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19805 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20186 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20164 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20447 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20238 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20359 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20501 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20391 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20376 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20145 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20169 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20229 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20376 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20391 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20501 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20359 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20238 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20447 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20164 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20186 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19805 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19756 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19625 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 20008 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19627 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18826 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18558 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17865 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18558 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18826 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19627 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19428 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17727 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.