posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28466 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22666 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23572 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23929 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23572 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24520 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24714 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24564 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25150 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24834 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25039 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25826 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25248 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25973 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25399 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25923 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25739 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25900 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25497 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25475 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25670 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25243 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25497 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25900 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25739 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25923 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25399 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25973 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25248 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25826 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25039 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24834 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25150 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25607 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24722 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24317 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23679 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23261 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23679 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24317 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24722 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24564 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22666 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


