posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26247 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20952 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21809 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22130 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21809 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22685 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22903 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22737 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23340 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23000 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23161 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23899 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23419 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24085 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23521 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24058 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23808 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24038 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23665 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23537 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23842 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23475 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23665 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24038 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23808 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24058 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23521 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24085 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23419 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23899 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23161 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23000 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23340 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23771 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22924 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22528 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21880 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21517 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21880 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22528 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22924 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22737 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20952 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


