posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25337 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20250 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21072 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21392 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21072 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21889 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22090 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21984 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22547 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22267 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22409 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23121 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22681 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23350 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22763 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23300 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23035 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23303 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22936 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22744 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23121 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22764 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22936 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23303 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23035 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23300 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22763 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23350 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22681 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23121 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22409 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22267 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22547 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22969 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22176 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21766 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21117 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20751 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21117 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21766 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22176 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21984 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20250 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


