posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26378 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21076 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21939 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22259 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21939 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22839 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23062 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22873 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23485 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23131 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23295 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24054 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23559 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24232 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23661 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24208 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23955 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24189 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23799 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23668 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23988 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23621 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23799 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24189 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23955 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24208 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23661 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24232 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23559 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24054 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23295 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23131 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23485 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23918 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23072 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22681 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22025 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21652 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22025 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22681 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23072 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22873 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21076 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


