posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26035 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20736 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21587 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21896 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21587 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22450 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22681 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22516 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23079 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22772 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22923 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23641 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23187 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23841 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23294 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23822 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23566 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23794 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23430 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23261 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23591 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23239 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23430 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23794 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23566 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23822 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23294 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23841 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23187 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23641 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22923 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22772 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23079 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23524 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22695 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22286 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21636 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21255 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21636 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22286 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22695 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22516 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20736 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


