posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28246 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22548 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23458 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23832 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23458 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24411 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24608 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24467 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25041 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24729 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24922 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25691 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25149 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25848 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25283 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25800 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25617 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25782 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25392 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25360 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25549 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25141 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25392 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25782 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25617 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25800 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25283 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25848 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25149 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25691 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24922 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24729 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25041 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25487 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24616 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24209 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23567 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23139 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23567 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24209 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24616 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24467 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22548 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


