posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 25068 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20124 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20929 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21245 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 20929 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 21747 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 21959 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21853 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22408 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22137 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22255 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22987 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22543 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23210 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22632 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23176 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22912 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23162 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22810 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 22588 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 22990 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 22630 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 22810 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23162 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 22912 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23176 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 22632 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23210 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 22543 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 22987 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22255 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22137 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 22408 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 22825 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22042 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21623 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20962 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 20591 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 20962 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 21623 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22042 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 21853 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20124 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


