posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26413 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21111 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21973 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22305 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21973 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22886 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23108 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22915 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23535 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23177 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23343 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24106 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23613 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24283 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23706 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24261 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24004 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24242 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23845 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23719 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24043 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23673 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23845 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24242 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 24004 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24261 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23706 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24283 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23613 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24106 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23343 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23177 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23535 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23966 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23119 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22731 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22071 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21690 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22071 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22731 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23119 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22915 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21111 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


