posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28220 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22528 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23437 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 23808 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23437 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24393 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 24593 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24447 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25019 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24712 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24903 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25668 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25127 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25822 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25259 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25779 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25596 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25755 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25371 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25339 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 25528 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25126 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25371 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 25755 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 25596 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 25779 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25259 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 25822 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25127 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 25668 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 24903 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 24712 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25019 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25470 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24591 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24180 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23546 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23108 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 23546 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24180 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 24591 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24447 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22528 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


