posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26395 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21094 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21955 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 22281 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21955 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22863 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 23086 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22890 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23507 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23150 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23314 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24077 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23583 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24253 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23682 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24235 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23977 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24216 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23822 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23692 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 24015 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23643 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23822 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 24216 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23977 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 24235 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23682 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 24253 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23583 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 24077 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 23314 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 23150 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23507 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23937 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23093 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22706 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22048 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21673 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 22048 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22706 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 23093 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22890 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 21094 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


