posted on 18/11/2020 20:10Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae
(although did he ever actually apologise? I thought that was part of the problem)
- Some days were dark, I wish that I could live it all again -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 28900 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22997 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23902 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 24274 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 23902 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 24856 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 25049 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24905 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25503 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25164 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25368 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26150 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25602 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26315 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25751 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26255 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26085 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26237 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25838 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 25833 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 26005 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 25567 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 25838 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 26237 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 26085 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 26255 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 25751 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 26315 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 25602 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 26150 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 25368 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 25164 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 25503 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 25935 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25052 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24647 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24004 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 23587 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 24004 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 24647 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 25052 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 24905 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 22997 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.


