posted on 19/11/2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.
I take it you don't agree with what it says
- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -
- <stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 12914 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10960 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11329 times)
- which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 11730 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 11329 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 12028 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 12251 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12366 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12350 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12550 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12596 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12747 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12882 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12966 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13018 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13026 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13067 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12934 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13069 times)
- Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 12870 times)
- Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 12796 times)
- any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 12752 times)
- How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 13069 times)
- Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 12934 times)
- So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 13067 times)
- Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 13026 times)
- Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 13018 times)
- I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 12966 times)
- I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 12882 times)
- go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 12747 times)
- do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 12596 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 12550 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 12350 times)
- I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 12636 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12406 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11916 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11688 times)
- Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 11140 times)
- Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 11688 times)
- Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 11916 times)
- It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 12406 times)
- Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 12366 times)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 10960 times)
Post Your Reply
You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.