2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

I take it you don't agree with what it says

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 21851 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 17630 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 18407 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 18704 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 19212 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 19427 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 19330 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 19522 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 19633 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 19677 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 20069 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 20042 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 20325 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 20120 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 20239 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 20371 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 20263 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 20254 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 20029 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 20046 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 20081 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 19886 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 19494 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 18717 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 18423 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 17734 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

posted on 19/11/2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse

Post Your Reply