2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

I take it you don't agree with what it says

- “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” - George Orwell -

<stirs the pot> - Gav 18/11 11:27 (read 26004 times, 26 posts in thread)
- Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 00:50 (read 20685 times)
  - Re: <stirs the pot> - Gramsci. 19/11 10:35 (read 21531 times)
    - which hard left, apologist publication did I lift that from? - Gramsci. 19/11 14:51 (read 21838 times)
- for years I thought she was a tory - eaststandman 18/11 12:13 (read 22400 times)
- not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - EmCee 18/11 11:39 (read 22633 times)
  - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 18/11 19:36 (read 22459 times)
    - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Nicolae 19/11 08:20 (read 23031 times)
      - Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci. 19/11 10:10 (read 22727 times)
        
        do you really, really want to know? - Gramsci. 19/11 10:11 (read 22879 times)
        
        go on, treat me to the full text link - Nicolae 19/11 10:30 (read 23607 times)
        
        I thought you'd be familiar with it already - Gramsci. 19/11 10:37 (read 23140 times)
        
        I was watching Chris Williamson on The Canary feed last night - Nicolae 19/11 11:33 (read 23799 times)
        
        Do you agree with the extract I posted up there though? As a libertarian - Gramsci. 19/11 11:36 (read 23239 times)
        
        Why wouldn't I (assuming it is indeed legally correct)? I have no beef with it whatsoever. - Nicolae 19/11 11:59 (read 23784 times)
        
        So if you agree with it, why did you suggest it came from an "apologist publication"? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:00 (read 23518 times)
        
        Well who else would pen it at this precise time, given these precise circumstances, other than a hard left, apologist publication (which it turned out it was) ? - Nicolae 19/11 12:14 (read 23744 times)
        
        How about --------> the EHRC report itself*? - Gramsci. 19/11 12:27 (read 23374 times)
        
        Arf! Wonderful to watch - Robin Ho 19/11 13:31 (read 23202 times)
        
        Re: How about the EHRC report itself*? - Nicolae 19/11 13:27 (read 23548 times)
        
        any chance ROR can show as much outrage at the Tory party forgiving Fabricant and his Anglo -Muslim comments - eaststandman 19/11 13:13 (read 23197 times)
  - I thought the independent EHRC had opined and that was final. - Nicolae 18/11 13:19 (read 23479 times)
    - It has and it was - arty_fufkin 18/11 16:19 (read 22661 times)
      - Re: It has and it was - Nicolae 18/11 18:03 (read 22255 times)
        
        Difficult to fully flesh out my thoughts in a few lines - arty_fufkin 18/11 20:06 (read 21592 times)
        
        Excellent post, probably the best and most honest / heartfelt summary I've read by anyone ./ - Nicolae 18/11 20:10 (read 21214 times)

Post Your Reply

You must log in to reply to posts. Use the log in form at the top of the page or click here to create an account.

posted on 19/11/2020 10:10Re: not a chance ... its a subject matter where no debate is allowed ... nt - Gramsci.

Report Abuse

Post Your Reply